Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 days ago
संविदा कर्मचारी को भी चाइल्ड केयर लीव की पात्रता, आयशा शेख मामले में मध्य प्रदेश हाईकोर्ट ने छुट्टी न देने वाले

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Yes, this is a problem with a person.
00:05This is a mother, who is now a child.
00:11This is a baby.
00:15This is a very rare disease.
00:18This is a very painful disease.
00:22This is a very painful disease.
00:22This is a very painful disease.
00:29This is a very painful disease.
00:32This is a very painful disease that can cause someone to do something.
00:36This is a teenager in 2014.
00:40The petitioner was a child's leave.
00:44He was a child's leave.
00:46He did not give it.
00:47or not. So, in 2020, they had a reputation file. Repetition
00:51was not allowed, but when the review was filed, the review was allowed.
00:55In the review, they said that they had a child care leave
00:59because they had a contractual employee in the state government.
01:04Then, they got a rate appeal to the government.
01:09The Supreme Court had a rate appeal. The Supreme Court had interfered
01:13during the September 17th and 24th.
01:18Then they had a document in the state and they had a contractual employee
01:23who had a contractual employee for the child care leave.
01:26Some circumstances were granted,
01:33the case was due to a child care leave present.
02:08This is the case of the
02:09What I am seeing is that some of the years of his past age...
02:13A family of his family and his family
02:14In every day in an hour he told them to decide their lives
02:21After, I did not even give a gift
02:25But I am not giving granted a gift from the President.
02:29That gift we had to go to High court
02:34We had to go to High court
02:53That's the same tenor of the order. Her representation has dismissed.
03:00After the high court
03:03and the appreciated
03:05which had been
03:07given him
03:08he wasPowered
03:10after he
03:10remand he said
03:14that they they
03:15component
03:15and
03:15other
03:16Mane
03:17they they
03:173
03:174
03:204
03:21constitutional rights
03:22citizens
03:23and if they demand
03:25that they
03:26should be
03:28right to life
03:32so they can
03:35petitioner
03:36request
03:37but they
03:38still
03:38then
03:419
03:449
03:45law
03:46litigation
03:48this is a novel litigation
03:50when the court has considered
03:51instruction
03:53and when the last hearing
03:55the Honorable High Court
03:57has ordered
03:57the interpretation
03:59but in high court
04:02the mother
04:05didn't give her
04:07too
04:07and that is a sensitive issue
04:08where the child is very bad
04:10and in the last time
04:13this is ordered
04:15cost
04:15the Honorable High Court
04:20has
04:20people who have
04:23paid $50,000
04:26cost
04:27and
04:27the
04:27the
04:27the
04:27the
04:27was
Comments

Recommended