Saltar al reproductorSaltar al contenido principal
  • hace 3 semanas
Esta semana, en la Redacción al Desnudo de El Espectador, les contamos que por error publicamos dos columnas de opinión con el mismo título. Ese título, difícil de repetirse por cierto, “El efecto cobra y la educación”, aplicaba muy bien a la columna de un educador, Santiago Espinosa, y efectivamente era el de su columna. Pero en cambio nada tenía que ver con la columna de Lisandro Duque, cuyo título era, o debía ser, “ADLE, un tipo de cuidado”. ¡Puro despiste!

Categoría

🗞
Noticias
Transcripción
00:00Hello, very rarely with specific current issues that are known by a name
00:05Very specifically, it happens that several columnists title their texts with the same title, it
00:13This puts us in a dilemma. If we change one, the one left without the most direct description...
00:19He will feel disadvantaged, so that, generally, even if they are repeated, we leave the
00:25The same headlines in different columns. But no, that's not what happened to us this time.
00:30On Monday, two columns were published with the same title. That title, difficult to repeat.
00:36Furthermore, the cobra effect and education applied very well to the column of an educator, Santiago
00:43Espinosa, and indeed it was the one from his column. But on the other hand, it had nothing to do with
00:49Lisandro Duque's column, whose title was, or should have been, "Give him some care."
00:56Pure oversight on José David's part, who initially placed Espinosa's column in that location and
01:01Then she moved it to put Lisandro in his usual place, but she forgot to change
01:07The headline. And to top it all off, in a convoluted opinion section this past Monday, in
01:14The head of Berrardú's anti-editorial also completely forgot an accent mark
01:20necessary.
01:21I told you last week that we would be in a complex technological transition this week.
01:26This week, which at the time of recording this, hasn't ended yet, we still have one more day, but
01:32It's gone quite smoothly. I hope that bread doesn't burn on the way out.
01:38But I think that may have been the reason for this week's appreciation.
01:45The editor's internal review of a text would have ended up published, and were it not for the reprimand, it would not have been published.
01:51by Ricardo Ávila, because we wouldn't have noticed.
01:54I think it looks cleaner this way because of what that paragraph said.
02:00among the information from a conversation between journalists that should never have been made public.
02:05And taking possession of a position is one thing, and positioning oneself in a position is another.
02:12We hope they do very well because of the work they do, but for now, what happened
02:17This week Sergio Esteban Vélez took office as director of the Cari Institute
02:24Cuervo and Andrés Rafael Ramos took possession of the General Archive of the Nation, as he said
02:30our headline.
02:31In the caption, however, as he rightly pointed out in his reprimand, the at symbol is used.
02:36Darwin B, we should have said they took possession and not positioned themselves.
02:42Not yet.
02:43I'll finish with two.
02:44Nothing to do with it.
02:45The populations in the countryside have nothing to do with the probations that are
02:50in the countryside.
02:51As we put in the hook of an article about the effects of the earthquake on agriculture.
02:58And the threats against the Supreme Court justices have even less to do with it.
03:03As our photo-news report on social media indicated, with the high temperatures due to the
03:09The NID phenomenon, which was what the explanatory paragraph of that photo news story was talking about.
03:16there on social media.
03:17Cables completely crossed.
03:19Well, that's all.
03:20See you.
03:21Bye.

Recomendada