Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 1 day ago
Ukrainian President Zelenskyy has warned that Moscow can no longer sustain the conflict without North Korean reinforcements. Does Moscow really depend on Pyongyang? North Korea analyst Jenny Town shares her insights with DW.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Joining me now is Jenny Town. She is a senior fellow at the Stimson Center and director of
00:04its Korea program and 38 North. She joins us again from Washington. Jenny, it's good to have
00:10you back on the program. When you were with us on the 31st of July, the estimate was another
00:1630,000 North Korean troops. Now Zelensky says as many as 50,000. He has not told us how Ukraine
00:24knows this. I mean, how seriously should we take that number? I think it's really hard to assess
00:31the number itself and 50,000 seems very high considering the casualty rates we've seen before
00:38given how much attention they placed on, you know, trying to build the hero narrative knowing that
00:44this is not a popular war to advertise inside North Korea. But certainly that cooperation is there
00:53and more troops are being prepared to go. Exactly how many I think is still under debate and we'll
01:00have to see. But some reports are estimating closer to about 20,000 or closer to what we saw before
01:06in the first deployment that the North Koreans had to Russia.
01:10At what point does North Korean involvement become
01:13significant enough to change Russia's ability to sustain this war?
01:20Well, I think that moment actually passed a while ago. You know, North Korea and Russia have been
01:25partners in this war for a couple of years now, and that partnership has grown. You know, the early
01:32days of providing the ammunition to allow for Russia's defense production to ramp back up into full
01:39capacity, you know, those days are over. And instead, what you see is a lot of two-way cooperation
01:44between the two, not only for North Korea still providing some level of material support to Russia,
01:50but a lot of military cooperation, a lot of economic cooperation, a lot of political cooperation
01:56that's going back and forth. There's also been stories about Ukraine, about Russia that's providing
02:03North Korea feedback on the initial missiles that they had sent in their performance to try and improve
02:10that quality. And I think that's what we're seeing now coming back into the country is those improved
02:15quality missiles to be able to use, but for North Korea to also be able to use in their own
02:21field in
02:22the future. Ukraine says that an actual North Korean missile unit is deploying to Russia, potentially
02:28with 120 ballistic missiles and six launchers. Does that move North Korea from being Russia's weapons
02:36supplier to maybe being a party to this war, something closer to a co-belligerent?
02:43I think, you know, I think it does. I think they're still probably very cautious that the Russians are
02:49probably still very cautious to keep North Koreans in Russian territory and not to cross over.
02:54But this is part of, you know, what was, you know, established under the Comprehensive Strategic
03:00Partnership Treaty as well that the two signed in 2024. So, you know, I don't think it's surprising to see
03:07this cooperation expand, especially given how Iran was helping provide some weaponry to Russia in the past
03:15as well and can no longer do that. So it does really place a much greater importance on North Korea
03:22as a partner
03:23and as one of the very few partners that Russia does have to continue and to prolong its warfighting
03:31capabilities.
03:32President Zelensky, he says that North Korea is using Ukraine to learn modern warfare. And you have
03:39warned recently about exactly that. Drones, artificial intelligence, electronic warfare, attacks on
03:44communications, even satellite systems. Is Ukraine becoming a live fire laboratory for how North Korea
03:51might one day fight South Korea?
03:56Yeah, I think so. There's obviously a lot of lessons that they're learning. You know, they haven't had
04:01battlefield experience since 1953. So this is really an important opportunity for them to find out what
04:09they don't know and to really fill in those gaps and adapt to modern technologies, modern tactics, and
04:17especially what we see is a real emphasis on multi-domain tactics. I think we're seeing these
04:22lessons being reinforced in the war in Iran as well. And, you know, it really has a lot of implications
04:28of how differently a war in the Korean Peninsula will look in the future and raises a lot of questions
04:34of how prepared countries like South Korea are for a new type of war, especially when it comes to their
04:41own civil defense and civilian resilience. What is Russia teaching North Korea that Kim Jong-un
04:49could not realistically learn on his own? And what worries you the most about that?
04:56Well, I think really just a lot of the multi-domain capabilities and seeing it in practice, how it's
05:02used, and the ability, you know, it's not just watching the missiles and where the missiles are going,
05:08but it's really, you know, how do you integrate cyber operations, electronic warfare, GPS jamming,
05:16communications jamming, all of these kinds of things to create a more chaotic environment that's
05:22very hard to predict where that, where the center of attention is going to be, how those different
05:28elements are going to reinforce each other or create greater chaos. And the fact that right now we also
05:34don't have, you know, strong crisis communication between adversarial blocks to try and manage that
05:42kind of, you know, chaotic environment in case of a contingency on the peninsula. So I think, you know,
05:47there's a lot of really concerning developments that we're seeing here that really talk about the
05:53changing nature of warfare in general, and especially if there are multi-front conflicts going on at the
06:01same time. Jenny Towne, as always, Jenny, good to have you on the program. Good to get your valuable
06:05analysis. Thank you. Thanks.
Comments

Recommended