Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 weeks ago
The Court of Appeal has reserved its judgment in an appeal by the Malaysian Bar relating to its bid to commence judicial review against the Federal Territories Pardons Board's decision that reduced Datuk Seri Najib Razak's sentence in the SRC International Sdn Bhd case.

Read more at https://tinyurl.com/2jmj3ump

WATCH MORE: https://thestartv.com/c/news
SUBSCRIBE: https://cutt.ly/TheStar
LIKE: https://fb.com/TheStarOnline
Transcript
00:03The Court of Appeal has reserved its decision on the Malaysian Bar's appeal seeking permission to
00:09commence a judicial review over the Federal Territory's pardons board's decision to reduce
00:15former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak's sentence in the SRC international case.
00:22A three-judge panel chaired by Justice Lim Chong Fong fixed August 7th for case management to
00:28set a date for delivering its judgment after hearing submissions from all parties on Friday.
00:35Representing the Attorney General, Senior Federal Counsel Ahmad Hanir Hanbali alias Arwi argued
00:41that the High Court was correct in dismissing the application, saying the Malaysian Bar was
00:46effectively attempting to challenge the young Departuan Agung's constitutional prerogative
00:51of mercy.
00:52He submitted that, if the King's decision to grant a pardon cannot be reviewed by the courts,
00:57the process leading to that decision is also not subject to judicial review.
01:03Meanwhile, Counsel for the Malaysian Bar, Datuk Yeo Yang Po argued that the application was
01:08neither frivolous nor an attempt to challenge the King's powers.
01:12Instead, he said the Bar was seeking to challenge the decision-making process of the pardons board,
01:18and urged the court to allow the appeal and send the case back to the High Court for a full
01:23hearing.
01:23The Malaysian Bar is seeking declarations that the pardons board's January 29, 2024 decision to halve
01:31Najib's prison sentence and reduce his RM210 million fine to RM50 million was illegal, unconstitutional,
01:39and invalid. The High Court dismissed the Bar's leave application in November last year, ruling that the
01:45matter was non-justiciable because the pardons board's decision formed part of the King's exercise of the
01:52prerogative of mercy.
Comments

Recommended