Jul 18, 2020 · Can Mathematica play the role of an easy to use advanced scientific calculator for an engineer who is most of the time dealing with multi-variable calculus and partial differential …

Nov 7, 2007 · Asking the question of MATLAB vs mathematica is a little like asking the question of which one should I choose between Microsoft Word 10 and Motocross Madness 2. The simple …

Sep 12, 2015 · Originally I was a power Matlab user and used Mathematica occasionally to solve and validate algebra, differential equations, etc. To make sure I coded Matlab correctly. These …

Jul 30, 2010 · There is a lot of overlap in functionality, but I'd say that Matlab is better for numerical computations and Mathematica is better for symbolic computations. Jul 30, 2010 #3

Sep 28, 2004 · Maple and Matlab have the best graphics in my opinion. In both of them you are allowed to rotate 3D graphics and zoom in on the spot (2D) in realtime. In Mathematica things …

Feb 16, 2015 · The complete MATLAB code is way more than this, but it can run about 160 complete time steps in 60 seconds, whereas the Mathematica code listed above alone takes …

Jul 4, 2005 · Reviews of Maple, Mathematica, and Matlab: Coming Soon to a Publication Near You Chonacky, N.; Winch, D.; Computing in Science & Engineering [see also IEEE …

Jun 17, 2015 · I consider Mathematica's NIntegrate to be much better than the integration algorithms in scipy. The algorithms in scipy do not have proper multi-dimensional integration …

Sep 29, 2018 · Same thing with Matlab and Mathematica. They are designed to do different things so what you pick should depend on your intentions. You could do some things with Matlab that …

Feb 17, 2013 · I'm dealing with the restricted circular three-body problem and solving the differential equations though numerical methods, ode15s on MATLAB and NDSolve on …